One group screams out, “We’re being oppressed!” The other group yells back in defense, “No you’re not!” And then a third group sometimes enters the conversation saying, “Can’t we all just get along?”

While the sentiment of this third group is good, their words are more insulting than they might think. What the oppressed hear is, “Just calm down about your pain. It’s not a big deal. If you stop talking and caring so much, we can all be at ease.”

As though this isn’t insulting enough, proposals are then given as to how to move forward without the ruckus. Many think that true justice is created by your average citizen calling their state representatives, filing the correct paperwork, and magically changing city, state, and federal laws with their average lawmaking genius.

While lawmaking is appropriate when addressing issues of oppression, it walks hand in hand with activism. When your house is on fire, you don’t have a few decades to put it out. You address the problem as loudly and as quickly as you can without becoming an oppressor yourself. You scream. You shout. You march down the street. You make a maladjusted holy ruckus like Jesus when he flipped the courtyard tables.

When Jesus blessed the peacemakers, he was not endorsing the silence of the oppressed, because few things made him more angry than oppression. Peacemaking is an invitation to find a Jesus-way forward to free people from oppression—not an invitation to silence people from talking about their oppression. May we hear the plight of our neighbors and understand how we might best help them.

4 responses to “Silencing the Oppressed Is Not Peacemaking”

  1. Tricia Barnes-Garback Avatar
    Tricia Barnes-Garback

    I agree that option #3 as stated is inappropriate and insulting. However, what I often see as a failing in activism is a clear plan on the back end. Where do you want the activism to lead? Now that we have attention, do we have a clear plan for moving forward.

    For example, if your house is on fire, you need immediate help from the fire department. After the fire is out, we need to fix the wiring that caused the fire and lobby for better equipment for the fire department. You can’t plan for a house fire, but effective advocacy will only happen if there is a solid plan going in.
    What do we want? Change!

    When do we want it? Now!

    What does change look like? Ummmm

    Like

    1. Yeah, I’ve seen this on plenty of coalitions I’ve been on. We’re good at informing each other about what’s wrong but struggle to know what to do. We need more skilled leaders like MLK to create wise ways forward through all of the elements we need to address in activism.

      Like

      1. Tricia Barnes-Garback Avatar
        Tricia Barnes-Garback

        This. It’s hard to find leaders who are gifted in both activism and long-term political planning. And when you do, they don’t want the job!

        Hey Jamin…nudge nudge

        Like

Leave a reply to Jamin Bradley Cancel reply

Discover more from Jamin Bradley

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading